Electrically evoked potentials recorded in adult and pediatric CLARION implant users.

The purpose of this study was to record electrical auditory brain stem responses (EABRs) and electrical middle latency responses (EMLRs) in the clinic from 3 adult CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant subjects and to record EABRs in the operating room from 3 pediatric subjects. For 2 of the 3 adult subjects, EABR thresholds were within the subject's behavioral dynamic range, whereas 1 adult subject's EABR thresholds were either absent or, when present, exceeded the upper limit of the dynamic range. For this subject, EMLRs were absent or of poor morphology for the channels tested. Moreover, this subject was not able to understand speech in an open-set, auditory-only format. The EABR thresholds obtained with children were within the behavioral dynamic range for 2 of the 3 subjects, but exceeded comfortable loudness levels for 1 subject. Although the EABR thresholds were measured at stimulus levels that were audible for all subjects, the relationship of the EABR threshold levels to behavioral measures of loudness varied. Evoked potentials that originate more centrally, such as the EMLR, should be investigated further to determine the possible relationship to postimplant performance.

Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential.

OBJECTIVE: This study outlines a series of experiments using the neural response telemetry (NRT) system of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant to measure the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP). The goal of this investigation was to develop a protocol that allows successful recording of the EAP in a majority of CI24M cochlear implant users. DESIGN: Twenty-six postlingually deafened adults participated in this study. A series of experiments were conducted that allowed us to examine how manipulation of stimulation and recording parameters may affect the morphology of the EAP recorded using the Nucleus NRT system. RESULTS: Results of this study show consistent responses on at least some electrodes from all subjects. Cross-subject and cross electrode variations in both the growth of the response and the temporal refractory properties of the response were observed. The range of stimulus and recording parameters that can be used to record the EAP with the Nucleus NRT system is described. CONCLUSIONS: Using the protocol outlined in this study, it is possible to reliably record EAP responses from most subjects and for most electrodes in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users. These responses are robust and recording these responses does not require that the subject sleep or remain still. Based on these results, a specific protocol is proposed for measurement of the EAP using the NRT system of the CI24M cochlear implant. Potential clinical implications of these results are discussed.

Multichannel cochlear implantation with inner ear malformation: case report of performance and management.

A small percentage of children who have received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant have cochlear malformations of the inner ear and consequent partial electrode insertions. This case describes one child with a cochlear "common cavity" who received an implant at a young age. The case has been further complicated by a gradual malfunction of the electrode array, although the device has not failed completely. Despite the increase in the number of nonfunctional electrodes over time, the subject has continued to improve in auditory, speech production, and language development over a 30-month period. Methods are discussed for clinical monitoring of both performance and the stability of electrodes over time. The circumstances of this case reinforce the importance of postimplant collaboration with families and school staff and highlight the need for objective measures to evaluate both longitudinal changes in performance and device integrity.

Auditory performance of children with cochlear ossification and partial implant insertion.

The management of the profoundly deaf child with a cochlear implant poses a special challenge, particularly when total ossification of the cochlea is present. In this setting, insertion of an electrode array into a child's cochlea is often difficult. Our experience supports the feasibility of partial insertion of a multichannel implant into the basal turn of an ossified cochlea. Five children with ossified cochleae who had undergone partial implantation of a multichannel electrode were compared with the performance of matched controls who had full insertion of multichannel implants. No dramatic differences were detected during a 6- to 18-month follow-up period on selected test measures. These preliminary results suggest that active electrode number may exert a limited effect on performance with a cochlear implant. Drilling out the basal turn of an ossified cochlea in conjunction with partial insertion of a multichannel implant appears to be an acceptable surgical and rehabilitational alternative for placement of a cochlear implant prosthesis in children with complete cochlear ossification.

Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system.

The performance of 28 children with the Nucleus multi-channel cochlear implant, who had used the device an average of 1.7 yr, was examined on a battery of speech perception measures. All children demonstrated better speech perception skills with the implant than they had in the preimplant condition with hearing aids. With the Nucleus implant, 61% of the children demonstrated some open-set speech recognition and another 14% demonstrated closed-set speech recognition. Scores on the tests were corrected for guessing and a hierarchy of test difficulty was developed. The results revealed systematic differences in performance as a function of perception task and test format. The results of regression analyses, which were performed to identify predictors of success, showed that communication mode made a significant unique contribution to the variance in performance among subjects on an open-set word recognition test. When the scores of the children who used oral or total communication were compared on the full battery of tests, however, there were few significant group differences.

Pediatric cochlear implant candidacy issues.

Children with progressive sensorineural hearing impairment represent a special challenge to the audiologist and the otologist. These are patients with some residual auditory abilities that deteriorate with time as the hearing loss progresses. No doubt, the unnecessary implantation of an ear that significantly benefits from amplification needs to be avoided at all costs. By the same token however, there appears to be no advantage to waiting an inordinate amount of time after the loss of functional auditory abilities before recommending implantation. At times when a complete loss is predictable, implantation may be advantageous before the onset of complete auditory deprivation. Steps the clinicians should take to manage these patients effectively are briefly summarized below: Implementation of rigorous and frequent audiologic monitoring. If, for instance, a significant progressive loss of hearing has occurred over a 6-month period, resulting in a complete absence of open-set speech recognition abilities in the auditory-alone mode with appropriate hearing aids, it is probably counterproductive to wait to the point of a complete absence of aided speech detection. Implantation at a critical point in time will prevent complete auditory deprivation. Parental counseling concerning various management strategies, such as use of vibrotactile devices, changing communication skills, and issues involving cochlear implants need to be undertaken early. Parents need to be involved in every phase of the evaluation process because they are the ones who make the final decision concerning the implantation of their child. Relatively early implantation should be considered in light of what is known concerning the effects of disruption in a child's linguistic, cognitive, and emotional development resulting from complete auditory deprivation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Labyrinthine ossification after meningitis: its implications for cochlear implantation.

Labyrinthine ossification can be found in a high percentage of patients with profound deafness resulting from bacterial meningitis. Radiographic evidence of ossification can be found as early as 2 months after the acute infection, indicating that the intracochlear process probably begins much earlier. If long, intracochlear cochlear implants are to be most successfully used in these patients, an aggressive approach to clinical management following the meningitis should be taken. Illustrative case reports and suggested guidelines for evaluation and treatment are given.